In more complex environments beyond the bioreactor we can imagine that the issues of designing predictable and reliable function are compounded. Formal methods for discovering the interaction between host and heterologous genes and environmental conditions should lead to principles of design by which desirable
see more synthetic function is maintained in the face of variable conditions. One approach is to systematically vary both environmental conditions and gene expression to map the interactions between environmental components and each gene that affect fitness and designed phenotype. Skerker et al. used large-scale insertional mutagenesis of the ethanol producing bacterium, Zymomonas mobilis, to discover the genes that affect tolerance to and productivity in cellulosic hydrolysates that can be feedstocks for industrial fermentation [ 61••]. Such PARP inhibitor plant hydrolysates also contain many compounds that inhibit microbial growth and fermentation. By mapping how every gene in this organism conferred fitness in both purified components and mixtures, 44 genes were identified to be key determinants of performance and linked to particular classes of chemical stressor. It was possible to infer from this gene set that the real hydrolysates contained an inhibitory compound, methylglyoxal,
that had not been detected previously. The information was used to target genes for strain improvement. In a related approach Sandoval et al. used barcoded promoter mutation libraries to map the effect of increased or decreased expression of nearly every gene in E. coli onto growth in several model environments (cellulosic
hydrolysate, low pH, and high acetate). They identified more than 25 mutations that improved growth rate 10–200% for several different conditions and pointed to subsystems of importance to tolerance to hydrolysate [ 62••]. The Sandoval study, however, also demonstrated how difficult it could be to combine knowledge of these different mechanisms together Atazanavir to vastly improve strain performance because of a type of buffering epistasis among effects of the different genes. Because there are few applications wherein it is currently feasible to release synthetic organisms into open ecologies there have been scarce studies quantifying the biological basis of persistence of synthetic organisms in complex ecologies or the impact of the synthetic organism thereon. There are not yet rigorous metrics based on definitions of environmental health for how much it is permissible to perturb an ecology through introduction of an organism. However, we have progressed to the point where it is increasingly possible to map interactions between an introduced microbe and the surrounding ecology using metagenomic and associated functional techniques.