, 2010). The evolution of the human brain is a vast subject. We argue that although we are at a stage where large-scale genomic data collection is clearly useful and already has provided a key foundation, it is not sufficient. A theoretical framework founded on understanding the key processes of neurodevelopment and cortical neural function that distinguish primates and humans from other mammals is essential. The radial unit and protomap hypotheses provide structures on which to explore specific early developmental events’ role in human cerebral cortical evolution. However, understanding
GDC0199 differences in both the pace and final state and diversity of cortical neuronal phenotypes in humans will require further comparative cellular, behavioral, and anatomical studies to provide a true catalog of human differences. Comparisons with our closest living ancestors, the chimpanzee, will be critical to define human specificity, but broader phylogenetic comparisons including widely used experimental models such as invertebrates, mice, and other primates are also fundamental. But even that may not guarantee success. One example of a well-described anatomical human adaptation that has been particularly vexing to connect to developmental or molecular mechanisms is the genesis of human cerebral asymmetry, which is fundamental
to the emergence of human language. Its anatomical basis www.selleckchem.com/products/jq1.html has been appreciated for nearly a half century, yet, despite more than a decade of significant progress in defining the molecular pathways involved in visceral asymmetry, relatively little is understood about how this might connect to cerebral cortex asymmetry. It is also clear that gene regulation has played a key role in human cerebral evolution. Integration of the multiple types of functional genes, from those
coding proteins to multiple forms of noncoding RNAs, as well as mechanisms PD184352 (CI-1040) of gene regulation, will require innovative systems biology methods. Nevertheless, we are now at a place where we can connect differentially expressed genes to biological processes and understand the regulatory elements that may drive these processes, moving from an era of genomic and molecular description to functional testing in model systems. Many challenges remain, including the tradeoffs between matching the intricacies of in vivo development often only approachable in nonprimates, such as mouse, and the vast species differences that warrant adopting in vitro human models. Technological advances, including three-dimensional organoid cultures (Lancaster et al., 2013) or mouse and mouse-human chimeras (Goldman et al., 2012), will soon improve this situation. The confluence of advances in comparative genomics and modern neurobiology has made what in the past may have seemed like an experimentally intractable problem readily addressable.