After our first few conditioning studies had been published, Bob learned of some very early papers in Russian that had reported putative conditioned immunological effects. He had these papers translated and then described and re-evaluated the presented data in a fascinating contribution (Ader, 1981b). Bob also wrote two papers

exclusively devoted to the early history of PNI (Ader, 1995 and Ader, 2000). In these definitive historical accounts, Bob gave full credit to those whose work took place shortly before or around the same time as our 1975 paper. In fact, he emphasized that it was the very juxtaposition of all this information www.selleckchem.com/products/ganetespib-sta-9090.html (Bob referred to this as the right stuff at the right time; Ader, Proteases inhibitor 2000) that served to substantiate the interconnectedness of behavior,

immunity, and the nervous and endocrine systems. That said, why do others join me in thinking of Bob Ader as the founding father of psychoneuroimmunology rather than one of several founding fathers? Several reasons come to mind. First, Bob recognized the importance of the conditioning studies within the context of integrated physiological systems that maintain homeostasis. That is, he understood that “in the real world,” the immune system does not operate as an autonomous agency of defense. More importantly, Bob did not keep this recognition to himself. Early on, he proselytized for this emerging field at meetings of various behavioral Montelukast Sodium and neuroscience societies and at other meetings in the US and abroad 3. He already had a stellar reputation as a behavioral psychologist and psychosomaticist,

so people in these fields listened and accepted 4—unlike most immunologists at the time, who listened with outright disbelief if not healthy skepticism. Second, Bob also had the simple but brilliant idea of inviting those scientists who had been gathering data about many facets of the CNS-immune system connection to contribute chapters to a book he called Psychoneuroimmunology ( Ader, 1981a). This compilation – the first of its kind – coalesced the field. Furthermore, titling this book Psychoneuroimmunology served to add this word to the lexicon of science. Now there was a single descriptive word (and the simple acronym of PNI 5) to categorize the study of interactions among behavior, the nervous system (including, of course, the endocrine system) and the immune system. The use of “psychoneuroimmunology” caught on and even engendered minor territorial skirmishes with those who preferred the even more cumbersome psychoneuroimmunoendocrinology or neuroimmunomodulation (which, when attached to the name of a society, made Bob query “neuroimmunomodulation of what?”). I don’t believe that Bob thought of himself as particularly clever when he coined the word psychoneuroimmunology6. In his view, it was a logical choice.