Similarly, as the researchers could

not verify whether the participants accessed the sound form in both types of stimuli, the differences reported in fMRI studies between the covert reading of word and nonword stimuli should be questioned. To address these caveats, in our experimental paradigm, participants had to read both words and nonwords out loud, allowing us Inhibitors,research,lifescience,medical to measure their reading performance. Moreover, word and nonword stimuli were strictly matched to visual characteristics (number of letters) and LY2835219 in vitro phonological complexity (number of phonemes, number of syllables, and syllabic structures). In doing so, we ensure that the visual and phonological features susceptible to interfere with the reading process are controlled, Inhibitors,research,lifescience,medical both at the early visual and at the late articulatory output stages. This allows us to record the hemodynamic responses that are specifically associated with the lexical and phonological pathways of reading, under the best conditions. We attribute the difference in activation found in the bilateral frontal regions, which was higher for nonwords than for irregular words,

to the grapheme-to-phoneme conversion associated Inhibitors,research,lifescience,medical with the phonological pathway of reading. Nonetheless, because the overt reading of irregular words and nonwords stimuli may differ from the early visual processing stage up to the articulatory Inhibitors,research,lifescience,medical output, the hemodynamic responses that were recorded in a 20-sec time interval reflected the whole processing, including the grapheme-to-phoneme processing. Further investigation is required before we may draw firm conclusions about the localization of the brain

regions that were involved in the grapheme-to-phoneme Inhibitors,research,lifescience,medical conversion. An advantage of the fNIRS over the fMRI technique is that the temporal course of the activation can be examined. Using this, we analyzed the activation across five time intervals in the right and left visual, temporal, and frontal Megestrol Acetate regions. The results indicated that most participants showed significant bilateral activation in the visual cortex for irregular words and nonwords in the early time interval (0–8 sec), moving to the right frontotemporal regions in the intermediate time interval (9–12 sec). In the late time interval (13–16 sec), we observed more participants with significant activation in the left IFG for irregular words and in the right IFG for nonwords. This latter hemispheric difference was lost when we averaged the hemodynamic responses over the entire (0–20 sec) time interval with the ANOVA revealing higher HbT values in frontal regions in nonword reading than in irregular word reading, regardless of the hemisphere.