Effective communication is essential in healthcare and it has been reported previously that a clinician’s choice of questioning can influence patients’ responses and the subsequent outcome of the encounter.

This study demonstrates that physiotherapists prefer open-focused questions when addressing the topic of patients’ presenting problems in initial clinical encounters, providing patients with a focus, whilst still allowing them to express themselves in their own words. Furthermore, the study has Cabozantinib solubility dmso highlighted that physiotherapists are inclined to interrupt patients as they respond to the key clinical question in 60% of encounters, which may negate this opportunity for patients to express what really matters to them. Further research is currently underway to explore this. These findings should be interpreted with caution, due to the small sample size of the study. Nonetheless, they are a snapshot of physiotherapists’ opinions and a foundation for future research. Considering the integral role that communication plays in every clinical encounter, it is suggested that more robust empirical evidence on opening encounters needs to be provided for the physiotherapy profession, including patients’ preferences and the impact on outcome. In the current healthcare systems, it is vital that clinicians make every effort to maximise their non-specific

treatment effects and enhance outcomes. Sources of funding: Arthritis Research UK is17830 funded the academic post of the senior researcher (LR). click here This work was conducted within the Southampton Musculoskeletal Research Unit. The authors wish to acknowledge: Laura Jenkins for her linguistic advice, the patients and staff in Southampton City Primary

Care Trust; members of the steering committee (Professor Paul Little, Professor Maria Stokes, Professor Cyrus Cooper, Professor Jennifer Cleland, Dr Rose Wiles and Mr Mark Mullee); Dr Bill Warburton at iSolutions, University of Southampton; and Jackson Dempsey from the CSP. “
“An estimated 632 million persons worldwide are reported to suffer from low back pain (LBP), making it the leading cause of years lived with disability (Vos et al., 2013). Patients with LBP frequently Aprepitant consult manual therapy practitioners in the United States, including osteopathic physicians and chiropractors (Barnes et al., 2008). Although established practice guidelines recommend manual therapies for chronic or persistent LBP (Chou et al., 2007 and National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence, 2009), questions remain about the mechanisms by which they exert their effects. Previous mechanistic research has focused on biomechanical effects of high-velocity, low-amplitude techniques, or “thrusts” (Triano, 2001, Evans, 2002, Maigne and Vautravers, 2003 and Evans and Breen, 2006).