Despite this, Selleck CT99021 19% of physicians report using amiodarone as first-line prophylaxis of postoperative AF. Data directly comparing the efficacy of these agents in preventing postoperative AF are lacking.\n\nObjective: To determine whether intravenous

metoprolol and amiodarone are equally effective in preventing postoperative AF after cardiac surgery.\n\nDesign: Randomized, prospective, equivalence, open-label, multicenter study. (ClinicalTrials.gov registration number: NCT00784316)\n\nSetting: 3 cardiac care referral centers in Finland.\n\nPatients: 316 consecutive patients who were hemodynamically stable and free of mechanical ventilation and AF within 24 hours after cardiac surgery.\n\nIntervention: Patients were randomly assigned to receive 48-hour infusion of metoprolol, 1 to 3 mg/h, according to heart rate, or amiodarone, 15 mg/kg of body weight

daily, with a maximum daily dose of 1000 mg, starting 15 to 21 hours after cardiac surgery.\n\nMeasurements: The primary end point was the occurrence of the first AF episode or completion of the 48-hour infusion.\n\nResults: Atrial fibrillation occurred in 38 of 159 (23.9%) patients in the metoprolol group and 39 of 157 (24.8%) https://www.selleckchem.com/products/poziotinib-hm781-36b.html patients in the amiodarone group (P = 0.85). However, the difference (-0.9 percentage point [90% CI, -8.9 to 7.0 percentage points]) does not meet the prespecified equivalence margin of 5 percentage points. The adjusted hazard ratio of the metoprolol group compared with the amiodarone group was 1.09 (95% CI, 0.67 to 1.76).\n\nLimitations: Caregivers were not blinded to treatment allocation, and the trial evaluated only stable patients who were not at particularly elevated risk for AF. The withdrawal of preoperative beta-blocker therapy may have increased the risk for AF in the amiodarone group.\n\nConclusion: The occurrence of AF was similar in the metoprolol and amiodarone groups. However, because of the wide range of the CIs, the authors cannot conclude that the 2 treatments were equally

effective.”
“Background: TSH receptor click here antibodies (TRAb) are the diagnostic hallmark of Graves’ disease (GD) and immunoassays for their detection have been available for more than 30 years over three generations of laboratory methods. Despite a growing body of data produced by clinical and laboratory research which demonstrates its elevated sensitivity and specificity, TRAb testing is poorly used for diagnosing GD.\n\nThe aim of our systematic review and meta-analysis is to verify the diagnostic performance of TRAb detected with 2nd and 3rd generation immunoassay methods.\n\nMethods: We searched for English articles using MEDLINE with the search terms “TSH receptor antibody assay”, “TSH Receptor antibody tests” and “Graves’ disease”.