A third limitation of our study was that the limit of detection and the recovery rate of M148(O) concentrations on ApoA-I by MRM were not determined. We used an S/N ratio

cut off of >3 as the detection limit for all of the analyzed peptides. However, the M148(O) oxidation peak area was well above this ratio (as shown in Fig. 1). A fourth limitation is batch-to-batch variation or auto digestion that can result from using different lots of trypsin. We have used multiple transitions per peptide and fresh trypsin match to minimize this source of variation. Finally, our clinical findings are a proof-of-concept demonstration, and need to be validated in larger clinical studies. We conclude that MRM can be applied to monitor the relative abundance of M148 ApoA-I oxidation. This approach would facilitate examining the relationship between M148 oxidation and BIBW2992 ic50 vascular complications in CVD studies. Dr. Yassine was supported by K23HL107389, AHA12CRP11750017. Drs. Nelson, Reaven, Lau and Yassine were supported by R24DK090958. The content is solely the responsibility of the authors and does not necessarily represent the official views of the National Institutes of Health. MRM method development was done by the Arizona Proteomics Consortium, which is supported by NIEHS grant P30ES06694 to the Southwest Crizotinib Environmental Health Sciences Center (SWEHSC to Dr.

Lau), NIH/NCI grant P30CA023074 to the Arizona Oxaprozin Cancer Center (AZCC), and by the BIO5 Institute of the University of Arizona. CHB and AMJ would also like to thank Genome Canada and Genome British Columbia for their support of the University of Victoria – Genome BC Proteomics Centre through Science and Technology Innovation Centre funding. We would also like to recognize Tyra J. Cross and Suping

Zhang of the University of Victoria – Genome British Columbia Proteomics Centre for the synthesis of all of the SIS peptides, and Juncong Yang, also of the Proteomic Centre, for exemplary technical support. We also thank Dr. George Tsaprailis with his assistance in running MRMs at the Arizona Proteomics Consortium. “
“Cell death after cerebral ischemia activates a series of molecular mechanisms that promote the production of inflammatory mediators, such as cytokines and chemokines, involved in leukocytes recruitment to the injured tissue [1]. Once reached the site of ischemic insult, leukocytes amplify the signal of cytokines contributing to tissue damage and growth of the infarct core. As a result, this process triggers brain inflammation and increases stroke severity [2]. On the other hand, the physiological functions of leukocytes are phagocytosis and clearance of dying cells and debris. In that context, a dual role has been hypothesized, with neuroinflammation being both deleterious and restorative and thus, making this pathway an interesting target to be therapeutically modulated [3].