7 +/- 7.9 years) underwent trans-apical LV lead implantation. Epicardial LV leads were implanted in 12 end-stage HF patients (group II; mean age 62.8
+/- 7.3 years). Medical therapy was optimized in all patients. The following parameters were compared during an 18-month follow-up period: LV ejection fraction (LVEF), LV end-diastolic diameter (LVEDD), LV end-systolic diameter, and New York Heart Association (NYHA) functional class.
Results: Nine out of 11 patients responded favorably to the treatment in group I (LVEF 39.7 +/- 12.5 vs GSK3326595 inhibitor 26.0 +/- 7.8%, P < 0.01; LVEDD 70.4 +/- 13.6 mm vs 73.7 +/- 10.5 mm, P = 0.002; NYHA class 2.2 +/- 0.4 vs 3.5 +/- 0.4, P < 0.01) and eight out of 12 in group II (LVEF 31.5 +/- 11.5 vs 26.4 +/- 8.9%, P = < 0.001; NYHA class 2.7 +/- 0.4 vs 3.6 +/- 0.4, P <
0.05). During the follow-up period, one patient died in group I and three in group II. There was one intraoperative LV lead JNJ-26481585 purchase dislocation in group I and one early postoperative dislocation in each group. None of the patients developed thromboembolic complications.
Conclusions: Our data suggest that trans-apical endocardial LV lead implantation is an alternative to epicardial LV pacing. (PACE 2012;35:124-130)”
“Background: The objective of this study is to analyze the spatial and temporal patterns of malaria incidence as to determine the means by which climatic factors such as temperature,
rainfall and humidity affect its distribution in Maputo province, Mozambique.
Methods: This study presents a model of malaria that evolves in space and time in Maputo province-Mozambique, over a ten years period (1999-2008). The model incorporates malaria cases and their relation to environmental variables. Due to incompleteness of climatic data, a multiple imputation technique is employed. Additionally, the whole province is interpolated through a Gaussian process. This method overcomes the misalignment problem of environmental variables (available MEK inhibitor at meteorological stations points) and malaria cases (available as aggregates for every district – area). Markov Chain Monte Carlo (MCMC) methods are used to obtain posterior inference and Deviance Information Criteria (DIC) to perform model comparison.
Results: A Bayesian model with interaction terms was found to be the best fitted model. Malaria incidence was associated to humidity and maximum temperature. Malaria risk increased with maximum temperature over 28 degrees C (relative risk (RR) of 0.0060 and 95% Bayesian credible interval (CI) of 0.00033-0.0095) and humidity (relative risk (RR) of 0.00741 and 95% Bayesian CI 0.005141-0.0093). The results would suggest that additional non-climatic factors including socio-economic status, elevation, etc. also influence malaria transmission in Mozambique.