002; miR-16: P=0.0006; miR-21: P=0.003) (Fig 1B). Same as above, miRNA expressions treated with RNase at 37°C were significantly lower than those without treatment (U6: P=0.003; miR-16: P=0.006; miR-21: P=0.01) (Fig 1C). As a consequence, naked RNA was degraded

by 5 µg/mL of RNase at both 4°C and 37°C for only 5 min. Figure 1 Degradation of naked Inhibitors,research,lifescience,medical RNA using RNase. (A) Electropherogram of total RNA treated with RNase. The total RNA is treated with 5 µg/mL of RNase for 0, 5, 10, 20, and 30 min at 4°C and 37°C. Two peaks, 18S and 28S ribosomal RNA (rRNA), … miRNA protected by exosome or cellular membrane from RNase in HT-29 cells To examine how miRNA was protected from RNase in vitro, we cultured HT-29 cells in the medium containing RNase; cellular miRNA extracted from the cells, exosomal miRNA from the exosomes, and free miRNA from the culture media were then analyzed. Cellular miRNA was sufficiently conserved under the treatment of RNase for 90 min (Fig 2A). Exosomal miRNA was conserved Inhibitors,research,lifescience,medical under the treatment of RNase for 30 min; however, the miRNA was degraded thereafter (Fig 2B). Free miRNA was degraded by the treatment of RNase within 30 min (Fig 2C). Cellular miRNA was sufficiently protected from RNase by cellular membrane. Inhibitors,research,lifescience,medical Exosomal miRNA was partially protected by exosome. On the other hand, free miRNA in the culture media was degraded immediately by RNase. Figure 2 RQ of each miRNA in HT-29 cells treated with RNase. (A) RQ of each miRNA

in cellular RNA treated with RNase. HT-29 cells are treated with 5 µg/mL of RNase for 0, 30, 60, and 90 min at 37°C. RQ of each group is compared with that of a no-treatment Inhibitors,research,lifescience,medical … Effects of RNase on miRNA in exosome or selleck chemicals colonocyte in feces We also examined the susceptibility of miRNA to RNase

degradation in feces. Colonocyte miRNA extracted from the fecal colonocyte, exosomal miRNA extracted from the fecal exosomes, and fecal miRNA extracted from the fecal homogenates were analyzed. Ct values of U6 in colonocyte miRNA, exosomal miRNA, and fecal miRNA without treatment of RNase were 31.14 (26.57-36.13) (mean (range)), Inhibitors,research,lifescience,medical 33.23 (30.40-35.15), and 32.60 (31.08-34.29), respectively (Table 1). Ct values of miR-16 were 28.60 Calpain (25.71-30.83), 29.69 (28.79-31.01), and 30.36 (29.47-31.05), respectively. Also, Ct values of miR-21 were 27.23 (23.83-29.00), 27.92 (26.27-30.46), and 29.32 (28.16-30.68), respectively. Colonocyte miRNA and exosomal miRNA were not susceptible to RNase degradation (Fig 3A and ​and3B).3B). On the other hand, fecal miRNA was degraded efficiently by the treatment of RNase (Fig 3C). In the feces, miRNA was sufficiently protected from RNase by cellular membrane and exosome. Table 1 Ct value of each miRNA in colonocyte miRNA, exosomal miRNA, and fecal miRNA Figure 3 RQ of each miRNA in fecal samples treated with RNase. (A) RQ of each miRNA in cellular miRNA treated with RNase. Exfoliated colonocytes are treated with 5 µg/mL of RNase for 0, 30, 60, and 90 min at 37°C.