In the

high-MOI infection, 11 genes and LAT peaked at 4 h learn more within the 6-h examination period, while in the Linsitinib low-MOI infection only the us3 transcript had a slightly lower R value at 6 h than at 4 h pi. The us3 gene was the only one among the 70 PRV genes which was expressed at a higher level at 4 h than at 6 h pi in another study [1]. Intriguingly, the ep0 mRNAs reached a 3.5-fold higher level in the low-dose than in the high-dose infection in an average cell at 6 h pi. Furthermore, at 6 h pi the ul1 and ul51 genes were expressed at an approximately 10 times higher level under the low-MOI than under the high-MOI conditions. Gene expression kinetics within the 0 to 6-h infection period The expression of most PRV genes basically differed under the two infection conditions (Additional file

1c), which is in contrast with the case of rhesus monkey rhadinovirus (a γ-herpesvirus), whose lytic gene expression commences at a fixed pace in infected cells, regardless of the MOI [48]. Most genes were expressed at a lower level in a cell in the low-MOI experiment in the first 4 h of infection, but more than half of these gene products surpassed the high-MOI values by 6 h pi. The R values of 3 PRV genes (ie180, ul1 and ul30) were higher in the low-MOI than in the high-MOI infection at every examined time selleck compound point, while the opposite was true (the R values of high-MOI were always higher) in 13 genes: ul5, ul15, ul17,

ul19, ul23, ul24, ul44, ul49.5, ul54, us6, us9, us1 and us3 (Figure 3). These latter genes nearly form clusters on the basis of their localization on the genome (genes in close vicinity are underlined), which suggests that the adjacent genomic sequences might be under common regulatory control. This observation is supported by the similarity of the Ra curves of adjacent genes (Additional file 1c). For example, the expression rates of the ul36, ul37 and ul38 genes were similar to each other in both experiments, but each of them exhibited an inverse expression pattern in the two infection conditions. All genes were expressed at a higher rate (Ra) within the 1 h to 6 h period of infection in the low-titre experiment, except for ie180 and the two antisense transcripts. The quantities of ie180 mRNAs were similar in the two experiments, except at 1 h pi, where the level of the transcripts was 2.8-fold higher in the low-MOI infection. Thus, the amount of total ie180 transcript in an infected cell appears to be under strict control, independently of the initial infection conditions. In contrast, the expression of the ep0 gene differed basically in the two experiments.