21,22 The increased risk of infection may also be due to the immunomodulatory effects of rheumatic disease.23,24 Indeed, in our study, 8 of 10 ISA with travel-related signs of skin infection had a rheumatic disorder, of which 4 (50%) used anti-TNF alpha drugs, opposed to 13 of 43 (30%) ISA with a rheumatic disorder without travel-related skin infection (p = 0.31). Because bacterial skin infection can be life-threatening, especially for immunocompromised persons, stand-by antibiotics for this may be useful for areas where the availability of proper treatment is poor. This Volasertib datasheet needs

further investigation. For IBD, the IR and the median number of days with diarrhea and abdominal pain were higher than among controls, both before and during travel. The incidence and burden of vomiting were higher among IBD, in particular during travel. The same was true for the burden of signs of skin infection, not the incidence. http://www.selleckchem.com/products/cx-5461.html No differences in travel-related fever, cough, rhinitis, and fatigue were found. Our study

design had distinctive strengths. Structurally specified data were obtained prospectively and on a daily basis. Data collection started before departure to gain insight into preexisting symptoms. It continued until 2 weeks after return from travel to encompass incubation periods of the most (acute) travel-related infectious diseases. With a travel companion serving as a matched control, situational specifics for the immunocompromised travelers and controls were comparable, which minimized any differences in exposure to infectious agents between the two groups. Both groups also matched for age and country of birth, but not for gender: both ISA and IBD were more often female. Yet, prospective new studies on travel-related infectious diseases found no association of symptoms of infectious diseases and gender.25–28 The prevalence of ISA and IBD among visitors of the travel clinic of the Public Health Service Amsterdam in 2008 was 0.5 and 0.4%, respectively, comparable with the general population in a developed country.10–12 Also, the ages of our subjects with rheumatoid

arthritis or IBD were comparable with the general population. Participants’ travel destinations were equally distributed across the four regions. Their median travel duration of 20 days corresponded well with the median travel duration of the average traveler.29,30 Thus, the study sample can be considered representative, and results can reasonably be applied to the average traveler with ISA or IBD to a developing country. Nevertheless, our findings represent immunocompromised persons who were well and confident enough to travel. This study also had some limitations. Sample size may not have been large enough to detect small differences. Secondly, some of the symptomatic illnesses could have been due to a non-infectious cause.