93 15.07 4.85 15.89 15.52 -1.21 p = 0.62 p = 0.23   11.84 11.16 8.17 10.92 10.13 6.15     Fat-Free

Mass (kg) 54.89 55.84 1.69 53.95 56.46 4.75 p = 0.001 p = 0.001   6.43 6.79 1.62 6.41 6.23 1.49     Total Body Water (L) 42.82 43.34 1.17 40.61 41.92 3.36 CBL0137 mouse p = 0.77 p = 0.35   5.73 5.96 2.18 4.55 4.32 3.06     Bench Press (kg/kg) 0.908 0.918 0.73 0.779 0.84 8.82 p = 0.005 p = 0.003   0.223 0.239 6.92 0.215 0.198 5.34     Leg Press (kg/kg) 3.77 4.21 11.99 3.56 4.22 18.4 p = 0.001 p = 0.10   0.69 0.73 8.36 0.93 1.14 5.74     Muscle strength Bench press (p = 0.005) and leg press (p < 0.001) strength were both increased with training. For bench press strength, NO was significantly www.selleckchem.com/products/cilengitide-emd-121974-nsc-707544.html greater than PL (p = 0.003. Serum markers of satellite cell activation (IGF-1 and HGF) Serum IGF-1 was significantly increased with training Pevonedistat in vitro (p = 0.046); however, NO and PL did not differ relative to IGF-1 (p = 0.86).   PL Day 0 PL Day 29 % Change NO Day 0 NO Day 29 % Change Time Group × Time Serum IGF-1 (ng/ml) 238.61 246.98 8.58 239.04 259.81 9.34 p = 0.046 p = 0.86   108.68 122.63 37.3 87.57 97.32 20.01     Serum HGF (pg/ml) 238.54 199.54 -8.71 251.21 344.34 47.42 p = 0.006 p = 0.02   89.72 75.02 34.06 69.87 232.14 62.49     Muscle c-met (ng/mg) 13.34 14.06 8.55 7.82 12.9 118.55 p = 0.019 p = 0.067   8.19 9.76 48.34 8.14 9.64 102.49     Myofibrillar Protein (μg/mg) 86.18 108.41 26.34

81.47 135.83 70.39 p = 0.001 p = 0.014   10.27 26.92 15.06 12.14 18.15 37.66     Total DNA (ug/mg) 27.79 29.59 4.67 27.89 52.37 88.75 Nabilone p = 0.011 p = 0.041   5.96 11.35 26.41 3.29 7.74 26.81     DNA/Protein 0.32 0.28 -8.77 0.34 0.39 14.22 p = 0.061 p = 0.14   0.06 0.12 42.24 0.04 0.09 23.76     Data are presented as means, standard deviations, and percent changes. For total DNA, both groups increased with training (p = 0.008) and the increases observed in NO were significantly greater than PL (p = 0.042). All of the myogenic regulatory factors were increased with training; however, NO was shown to be significantly greater than PL for Myo-D (p = 0.008) and MRF-4 (p = 0.022 (Figure 1). Figure 1 Data presented as means and standard deviations and expressed as a percent change in absorbance units from Day 0 to Day 29.